GQGU vs VTI
GQG US Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, GQGU or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GQGU | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $678M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 44 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +6.52% | +12.57%Best |
| 1Y Return | +4.83% | +17.22%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.86% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.0%Best | 12.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $10,540 | $12,461Best |
| Fund Family | GQG Partners LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 31, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.2 years).
GQGU vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GQGU vs VTI Performance
GQG US Equity ETF (GQGU) is an ETF from GQG Partners LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GQGU returned +4.83% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, GQGU is up 6.52% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.2% compared with 12.0% for GQGU. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for GQGU and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.15. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GQGU charges 0.49% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GQGU currently yields 0.96% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 92.4% of GQGU's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of GQGU is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 56 days apart, GQGU as of Aug 25, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
33 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 44 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GQGU | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.47% | 6.32% | 1.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 7.59% | 3.81% | 3.78% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 5.17% | 5.84% | 0.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.96% | 3.17% | 3.79% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 7.06% | 2.27% | 4.79% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 5.75% | 0.78% | 4.97% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.96% | 1.79% | 2.17% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.00% | 2.46% | 0.46% |
| UNPUnion Pacific Corp | 3.67% | 0.22% | 3.45% |
| LRCXLam Research Corpcommon Stock | 3.03% | 0.74% | 2.29% |
92.4% of GQGU is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GQGU or VTI?
GQGU has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GQGU or VTI?
Over the past year GQGU returned +4.83% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GQGU annualized +4.48% vs +20.12% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GQGU or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.2% annualized versus 12.0% for GQGU. Worst drawdown: GQGU -8.4% vs VTI -8.9%.
Should I hold both GQGU and VTI?
GQGU and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.15, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GQGU and VTI?
At least 92.4% of GQGU's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 36 positions we hold weights for in GQGU and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, GQGU or VTI?
GQGU yields 0.96% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than GQGU?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.