GRPM vs QQQ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GRPM or QQQ?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GRPM is less concentrated, with 26.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPM | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $507M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 62 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +15.34% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +13.97% | +21.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.32% | +25.63%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.35% | +15.24%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,363 | $20,324Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.4%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (15.8 years).
GRPM vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.8 years both funds cover.
GRPM vs QQQ Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GRPM returned +13.97% while QQQ returned +21.77%. Year to date, GRPM is up 15.34% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, GRPM compounded at +17.32% per year against +25.63% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.35% and +15.24% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.09% annualized vs +10.56%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRPM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 17.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for GRPM and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPM charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPM currently yields 0.65% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 61 holdings in GRPM and 102 in QQQ, totalling 100.0% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in GRPM and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 62 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GRPM (97.5% of the fund), and 60 for GRPM that do not appear in QQQ (97.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GRPM and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPM or QQQ?
GRPM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRPM or QQQ?
Over the past year GRPM returned +13.97% vs +21.77% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRPM annualized +10.56% vs +18.09% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GRPM or QQQ?
GRPM has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 17.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GRPM -44.5% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both GRPM and QQQ?
GRPM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPM or QQQ?
GRPM yields 0.65% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so GRPM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GRPM?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GRPM is less concentrated, with 26.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.