GRPM vs QQQ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GRPM delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPM | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $484M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +18.85% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +28.00% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.58% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.12% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2010 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GRPM vs QQQ Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GRPM returned +28.00% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, GRPM is up 18.85% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, GRPM compounded at +16.58% per year against +25.51% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +10.12% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.08% annualized vs +10.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.4% for GRPM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for GRPM and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPM charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPM currently yields 0.73% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GRPM and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 163 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPM or QQQ?
GRPM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRPM or QQQ?
Over the past year GRPM returned +28.00% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so GRPM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRPM annualized +10.84% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRPM or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.4% for GRPM. Worst drawdown: GRPM -44.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GRPM and QQQ?
GRPM and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRPM and QQQ?
GRPM and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 163 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPM or QQQ?
GRPM yields 0.73% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so GRPM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.