GRPM vs VTI
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. GRPM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPM | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $484M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +18.66% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +24.44% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.51% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.12% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
GRPM vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRPM returned +24.44% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, GRPM is up 18.66% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, GRPM compounded at +16.51% per year against +21.27% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +10.12% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, GRPM has the edge at +10.83% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRPM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for GRPM and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPM charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPM currently yields 0.73% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GRPM and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2796 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPM or VTI?
GRPM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRPM or VTI?
Over the past year GRPM returned +24.44% vs +22.19% for VTI, so GRPM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRPM annualized +10.83% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRPM or VTI?
GRPM has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GRPM -44.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GRPM and VTI?
GRPM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between GRPM and VTI?
GRPM and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2796 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPM or VTI?
GRPM yields 0.73% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.