GRPM vs VYM
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GRPM or VYM?
Small Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GRPM led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPM | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $507M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.65% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 62 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +15.34%Best | +11.35% |
| 1Y Return | +13.97% | +15.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.32%Best | +17.22% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.35% | +12.30%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 12.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,363 | $17,861Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 26.4% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 8, 2010 to Sep 18, 2026 (15.8 years).
GRPM vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 15.8 years both funds cover.
GRPM vs VYM Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRPM returned +13.97% while VYM returned +15.34%. Year to date, GRPM is up 15.34% versus a gain of 11.35% for VYM.
Over three years, GRPM compounded at +17.32% per year against +17.22% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +10.35% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, GRPM has the edge at +10.56% annualized vs +9.99%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRPM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 12.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for GRPM and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPM charges 0.35% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $4 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPM currently yields 0.65% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
24.0% of GRPM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's money is in holdings GRPM also owns.
GRPM and VYM share little of their money.
18 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in GRPM and 557 in VYM, against full books of 62 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 510 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GRPM (96.5% of the fund), and 42 for GRPM that do not appear in VYM (73.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GRPM | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HLNEHamilton Lane Inc | 2.02% | 0.01% | 2.01% |
| SLMSlm Corp | 1.83% | 0.02% | 1.81% |
| RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 1.57% | 0.06% | 1.51% |
| OSKOshkosh Corp. | 1.51% | 0.04% | 1.47% |
| THGHanover Insurance Group Inc | 1.46% | 0.03% | 1.43% |
| TXRHTexas Roadhouse Inc | 1.44% | 0.05% | 1.39% |
| WFRDWeatherford International Plc | 1.45% | 0.03% | 1.42% |
| VOYAVoya Financial Inc | 1.32% | 0.04% | 1.28% |
| SIGISelective Insurance Group Inc | 1.30% | 0.02% | 1.28% |
| BAHBooz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp. | 1.27% | 0.03% | 1.24% |
24.0% of GRPM is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPM or VYM?
GRPM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GRPM or VYM?
Over the past year GRPM returned +13.97% vs +15.34% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRPM annualized +10.56% vs +9.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GRPM or VYM?
GRPM has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 12.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GRPM -44.5% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both GRPM and VYM?
GRPM and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GRPM and VYM?
24.0% of GRPM's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.6% of VYM's is in holdings GRPM also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 61 positions we hold weights for in GRPM and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPM or VYM?
GRPM yields 0.65% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GRPM?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GRPM led over 3Y and the full window, VYM over 1Y and 5Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 26.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.