GRPM vs VXUS
GRPM vs VXUS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. GRPM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRPM | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $484M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.73% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +19.18% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.94% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.43% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +10.51% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -44.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2010 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GRPM vs VXUS Performance
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 GARP ETF (GRPM) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRPM returned +27.94% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, GRPM is up 19.18% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, GRPM compounded at +16.43% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +10.51% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, GRPM has the edge at +10.87% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRPM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -44.5% for GRPM and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.79. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRPM charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRPM currently yields 0.73% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GRPM and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7921 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRPM or VXUS?
GRPM has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRPM or VXUS?
Over the past year GRPM returned +27.94% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so GRPM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), GRPM annualized +10.87% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRPM or VXUS?
GRPM has been the more volatile fund at 18.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GRPM -44.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GRPM and VXUS?
GRPM and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.79, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRPM and VXUS?
GRPM and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7921 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRPM or VXUS?
GRPM yields 0.73% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.