GRW vs VYM
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $67M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +4.68% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.72% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GRW vs VYM Performance
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRW returned +0.72% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, GRW is up 4.68% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.5% for GRW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRW charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRW currently yields 0.26% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GRW and VYM share 4 holdings out of 630 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRW or VYM?
GRW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $71 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRW or VYM?
Over the past year GRW returned +0.72% vs +24.22% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRW annualized +0.48% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRW or VYM?
GRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GRW -31.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GRW and VYM?
GRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRW and VYM?
GRW and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 8.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 630 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRW or VYM?
GRW yields 0.26% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.