GRW vs QQQ
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRW | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $67M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.04% | +17.30% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.78% | +24.93% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
GRW vs QQQ Performance
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GRW returned -0.78% while QQQ returned +24.93%. Year to date, GRW is up 3.04% versus a gain of 17.30% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 16.9% for GRW. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.5% for GRW and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRW charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRW currently yields 0.26% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
GRW and QQQ share 10 holdings out of 123 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRW or QQQ?
GRW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRW or QQQ?
Over the past year GRW returned -0.78% vs +24.93% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRW annualized -0.22% vs +13.06% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRW or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 16.9% for GRW. Worst drawdown: GRW -31.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both GRW and QQQ?
GRW and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRW and QQQ?
GRW and QQQ share 10 common holdings with a 16.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 123 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRW or QQQ?
GRW yields 0.26% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.