GRW vs VTI
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +4.68% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +0.72% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
GRW vs VTI Performance
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRW returned +0.72% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, GRW is up 4.68% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.5% for GRW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRW charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRW currently yields 0.26% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GRW and VTI share 28 holdings out of 2790 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRW or VTI?
GRW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRW or VTI?
Over the past year GRW returned +0.72% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRW annualized +0.48% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRW or VTI?
GRW has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GRW -31.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GRW and VTI?
GRW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRW and VTI?
GRW and VTI share 28 common holdings with a 16.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2790 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRW or VTI?
GRW yields 0.26% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.