GRW vs VOO
TCW Durable Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GRW | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $67M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.26% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +3.04% | +12.95% | |
| 1Y Return | -0.78% | +20.69% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.09% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -31.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | TCW ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 5, 2024 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GRW vs VOO Performance
TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW) is a ETF from TCW ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GRW returned -0.78% while VOO returned +20.69%. Year to date, GRW is up 3.04% versus a gain of 12.95% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -31.5% for GRW and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GRW charges 0.75% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GRW currently yields 0.26% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GRW and VOO share 21 holdings out of 515 unique holdings combined, representing a 16.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GRW or VOO?
GRW has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GRW or VOO?
Over the past year GRW returned -0.78% vs +20.69% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), GRW annualized -0.22% vs +13.50% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GRW or VOO?
GRW has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GRW -31.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GRW and VOO?
GRW and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GRW and VOO?
GRW and VOO share 21 common holdings with a 16.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 515 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GRW or VOO?
GRW yields 0.26% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.