GXC vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXC | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $472M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 1,267 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -8.35% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | -3.21% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +10.91% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -1.27% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -72.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2007 | May 24, 2001 |
GXC vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXC returned -3.21% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, GXC is down 8.35% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, GXC compounded at +10.91% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -1.27% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.3% for GXC and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXC charges 0.59% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $3 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXC currently yields 2.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GXC and VTI share 1 holdings out of 4019 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXC | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNH | 0.01% | 0.52% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXC or VTI?
GXC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXC or VTI?
Over the past year GXC returned -3.21% vs +21.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), GXC annualized +3.38% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXC or VTI?
GXC has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GXC -72.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GXC and VTI?
GXC and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXC and VTI?
GXC and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 4019 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXC or VTI?
GXC yields 2.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so GXC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.