GXC vs VYM
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GXC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.59% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $474M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.19% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 1,267 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -9.21% | +15.29%Best |
| 1Y Return | -6.37% | +22.23%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.00% | +18.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.95% | +12.14%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.9% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -72.3% | -58.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $8,609 | $17,734Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.9% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Mar 19, 2007 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 23, 2007 to Sep 3, 2026 (19.4 years).
GXC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.4 years both funds cover.
GXC vs VYM Performance
State Street SPDR S&P China ETF (GXC) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXC returned -6.37% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, GXC is down 9.21% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.
Over three years, GXC compounded at +9.00% per year against +18.81% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -2.95% and +12.14% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.99% annualized vs +3.33%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.9% compared with 14.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -72.3% for GXC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXC charges 0.59% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $59 vs $4 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXC currently yields 2.19% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
1.6% of VYM's money is in holdings GXC also owns.
VYM and GXC share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 91 days apart, GXC as of Mar 31, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,233 positions we hold weights for in GXC and 603 in VYM, against full books of 1,267 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 569 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GXC (95.9% of the fund), and 26 for GXC that do not appear in VYM (3.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.01% | 1.56% | 1.55% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GXC and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXC or VYM?
GXC has an expense ratio of 0.59% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXC or VYM?
Over the past year GXC returned -6.37% vs +22.23% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), GXC annualized +3.33% vs +6.99% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXC or VYM?
GXC has been the more volatile fund at 25.9% annualized versus 14.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXC -72.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GXC and VYM?
GXC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXC and VYM?
1.6% of VYM's money is in holdings GXC also owns. 1.6% of VYM's is in holdings GXC also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 1,233 positions we hold weights for in GXC and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXC or VYM?
GXC yields 2.19% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GXC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 33.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.