GXPC vs VYM
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GXPC or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GXPC led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 93.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $113M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 26 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +3.34% | +9.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.62% | +13.66%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.87% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.1% | 10.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,318Best | $11,784 |
| Top 10 Weight | 93.8% | 26.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPC vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPC vs VYM Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +9.62% while VYM returned +13.66%. Year to date, GXPC is up 3.34% versus a gain of 9.59% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.1% compared with 10.4% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
12.6% of GXPC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.0% of VYM's money is in holdings GXPC also owns.
GXPC and VYM share little of their money.
8 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 557 in VYM, against full books of 26 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 520 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GXPC (94.1% of the fund), and 16 for GXPC that do not appear in VYM (86.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPC | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.28% | 0.80% | 2.48% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.89% | 0.69% | 2.20% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 2.83% | 0.64% | 2.19% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.47% | 0.34% | 1.13% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.38% | 0.34% | 1.04% |
| OMCOmnicom Group Inc. | 0.38% | 0.09% | 0.29% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 0.21% | 0.05% | 0.16% |
| FOXFox Corp | 0.13% | 0.03% | 0.10% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GXPC and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPC or VYM?
Over the past year GXPC returned +9.62% vs +13.66% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +18.97% vs +14.66% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.1% annualized versus 10.4% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both GXPC and VYM?
GXPC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and VYM?
12.6% of GXPC's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 3.0% of VYM's is in holdings GXPC also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 557 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC yields 0.32% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GXPC?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. GXPC led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 93.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.