GXPC vs VYM
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $177M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -0.30% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +12.29% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
GXPC vs VYM Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +12.29% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, GXPC is down 0.30% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
GXPC and VYM share 5 holdings out of 573 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPC or VYM?
Over the past year GXPC returned +12.29% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +17.44% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both GXPC and VYM?
GXPC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and VYM?
GXPC and VYM share 5 common holdings with a 2.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 573 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or VYM?
GXPC yields 0.32% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.