GXPC vs QQQ
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GXPC or QQQ?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Growth.
GXPC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 93.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $113M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 26 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +5.17% | +21.71%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.23% | +25.89%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +28.80% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 20.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -12.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $12,558 | $13,350Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 93.8% | 46.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 25, 2026 (1.2 years).
GXPC vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.
GXPC vs QQQ Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +11.23% while QQQ returned +25.89%. Year to date, GXPC is up 5.17% versus a gain of 21.71% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 20.4% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -12.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
87.5% of GXPC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 13.8% of QQQ's money is in holdings GXPC also owns.
Most of GXPC is already inside QQQ. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 26 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 86 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GXPC (83.8% of the fund), and 14 for GXPC that do not appear in QQQ (12.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPC | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 30.95% | 3.36% | 27.59% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 24.44% | 3.13% | 21.31% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 19.93% | 2.78% | 17.15% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 5.28% | 1.37% | 3.91% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.44% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.38% | 0.82% | 0.56% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.47% | 0.39% | 1.08% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 1.11% | 0.56% | 0.55% |
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 1.05% | 0.29% | 0.76% |
| TTWOTake-Two Interactive Software, Inc. | 0.59% | 0.19% | 0.40% |
87.5% of GXPC is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or QQQ?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. GXPC is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPC or QQQ?
Over the past year GXPC returned +11.23% vs +25.89% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +20.90% vs +27.22% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPC or QQQ?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 20.4% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs QQQ -12.0%.
Should I hold both GXPC and QQQ?
GXPC and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and QQQ?
87.5% of GXPC's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 13.8% of QQQ's is in holdings GXPC also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or QQQ?
GXPC yields 0.32% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GXPC?
GXPC has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 46.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 93.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.