GXPC vs VOO
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GXPC or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $114M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.08% |
| Holdings | 26 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +0.64% | +13.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.42% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,926 | $12,252Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.1% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.1 years).
GXPC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
GXPC vs VOO Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +8.42% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, GXPC is up 0.64% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 12.3% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
97.0% of GXPC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.8% of VOO's money is in holdings GXPC also owns.
Most of GXPC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
18 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 504 in VOO, against full books of 26 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 476 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GXPC (89.6% of the fund), and 5 for GXPC that do not appear in VOO (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A | 32.73% | 3.25% | 29.48% |
| GOOGAlphabet, Inc., Class C | 25.87% | 2.59% | 23.28% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 19.17% | 1.92% | 17.25% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.55% | 0.47% | 4.08% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Com Usd1 | 2.87% | 0.27% | 2.60% |
| DISWalt Disney Co/Thecommon Stock | 2.53% | 0.26% | 2.27% |
| TAt&t, Inc. | 2.39% | 0.22% | 2.17% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 1.41% | 0.21% | 1.20% |
| CMCSACOMCAST CORP CLASS A | 1.30% | 0.14% | 1.16% |
| TMUST-mobile Us, Inc. | 1.29% | 0.12% | 1.17% |
97.0% of GXPC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPC or VOO?
Over the past year GXPC returned +8.42% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +17.37% vs +20.28% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 12.3% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPC and VOO?
GXPC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and VOO?
97.0% of GXPC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.8% of VOO's is in holdings GXPC also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC yields 0.32% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GXPC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.