GXPC vs VOO
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $177M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +1.18% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.56% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
GXPC vs VOO Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +14.56% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, GXPC is up 1.18% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
GXPC and VOO share 13 holdings out of 512 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.9% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPC or VOO?
Over the past year GXPC returned +14.56% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +19.05% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both GXPC and VOO?
GXPC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and VOO?
GXPC and VOO share 13 common holdings with a 6.9% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 512 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or VOO?
GXPC yields 0.32% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.