GXPC vs VXUS
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $177M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 28 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +1.18% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +14.56% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Jan 26, 2011 |
GXPC vs VXUS Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +14.56% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, GXPC is up 1.18% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $5 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
GXPC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7881 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or VXUS?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPC or VXUS?
Over the past year GXPC returned +14.56% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +19.05% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPC or VXUS?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both GXPC and VXUS?
GXPC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and VXUS?
GXPC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7881 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or VXUS?
GXPC yields 0.32% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.