GXPC vs IVV
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $111M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +1.12% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.93% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
GXPC vs IVV Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +13.93% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, GXPC is up 1.12% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
GXPC and IVV share 14 holdings out of 511 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPC or IVV?
Over the past year GXPC returned +13.93% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +18.92% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both GXPC and IVV?
GXPC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and IVV?
GXPC and IVV share 14 common holdings with a 6.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 511 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC yields 0.32% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.