GXPC vs IVV
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GXPC or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPC | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $114M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.32% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 26 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.64% | +13.39%Best |
| 1Y Return | +8.42% | +20.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 12.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $11,926 | $12,250Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 94.1% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 4, 2026 (1.1 years).
GXPC vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
GXPC vs IVV Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Communication Services ETF (GXPC) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year GXPC returned +8.42% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, GXPC is up 0.64% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 12.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPC and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPC charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPC currently yields 0.32% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
97.2% of GXPC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.7% of IVV's money is in holdings GXPC also owns.
Most of GXPC is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
19 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 505 in IVV, against full books of 26 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 478 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for GXPC (89.6% of the fund), and 5 for GXPC that do not appear in IVV (2.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPC | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc.Class A | 32.73% | 3.19% | 29.54% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 25.87% | 2.56% | 23.31% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 19.17% | 1.94% | 17.23% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 4.55% | 0.47% | 4.08% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.87% | 0.29% | 2.58% |
| DISWalt Disney Co | 2.53% | 0.27% | 2.26% |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.39% | 0.24% | 2.15% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 1.41% | 0.17% | 1.24% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp-class A Cmcsa | 1.30% | 0.13% | 1.17% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 1.29% | 0.12% | 1.17% |
97.2% of GXPC is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPC or IVV?
Over the past year GXPC returned +8.42% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPC annualized +17.37% vs +20.26% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 12.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: GXPC -16.6% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPC and IVV?
GXPC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPC and IVV?
97.2% of GXPC's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.7% of IVV's is in holdings GXPC also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in GXPC and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPC or IVV?
GXPC yields 0.32% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GXPC?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 94.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.