GXPD vs VYM
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, GXPD or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPD | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 51 | 613 |
| YTD Return | -1.98% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.81% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 9.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $10,226 | $12,141Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.4% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
GXPD vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
GXPD vs VYM Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPD returned -1.81% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, GXPD is down 1.98% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 9.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPD and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPD charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPD currently yields 0.34% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
19.3% of GXPD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.1% of VYM's money is in holdings GXPD also owns.
GXPD and VYM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, GXPD as of Sep 1, 2026 and VYM as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
19 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in GXPD and 603 in VYM, against full books of 51 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 549 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GXPD (92.4% of the fund), and 26 for GXPD that do not appear in VYM (80.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPD | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 5.33% | 1.46% | 3.87% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 3.08% | 0.80% | 2.28% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.01% | 0.48% | 1.53% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.86% | 0.51% | 1.35% |
| FFord Motor Co. | 0.90% | 0.23% | 0.67% |
| NKENike Inc | 0.76% | 0.20% | 0.56% |
| GRMNGarmin Ltd. | 0.75% | 0.16% | 0.59% |
| YUMYum! Brands, Inc. | 0.70% | 0.18% | 0.52% |
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 0.66% | 0.21% | 0.45% |
| CCLCarnival Corp. | 0.49% | 0.15% | 0.34% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GXPD and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPD or VYM?
GXPD has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPD or VYM?
Over the past year GXPD returned -1.81% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPD annualized +2.05% vs +19.29% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPD or VYM?
GXPD has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 9.0% for VYM. Worst drawdown: GXPD -16.6% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both GXPD and VYM?
GXPD and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPD and VYM?
19.3% of GXPD's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 5.1% of VYM's is in holdings GXPD also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in GXPD and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPD or VYM?
GXPD yields 0.34% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than GXPD?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.