GXPD vs VOO
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GXPD or VOO?
VOO has been ahead.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPD | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $54M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 51 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -1.98% | +12.50%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.81% | +17.58%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 12.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $10,226 | $12,119Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 78.4% | 36.4%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 23, 2025 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.1 years).
GXPD vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.1 years both funds cover.
GXPD vs VOO Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPD returned -1.81% while VOO returned +17.58%. Year to date, GXPD is down 1.98% versus a gain of 12.50% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 12.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPD and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPD charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPD currently yields 0.34% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
97.2% of GXPD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.2% of VOO's money is in holdings GXPD also owns.
Most of GXPD is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
The two holdings books were reported 63 days apart, GXPD as of Sep 1, 2026 and VOO as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
39 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in GXPD and 505 in VOO, against full books of 51 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 457 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for GXPD (90.2% of the fund), and 6 for GXPD that do not appear in VOO (2.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GXPD | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 41.24% | 3.62% | 37.62% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 17.02% | 1.84% | 15.18% |
| HDHome Depot Inc/The | 5.33% | 0.54% | 4.79% |
| MCDMcdonald'S Corp | 3.08% | 0.30% | 2.78% |
| BKNGBooking Holdings, Inc. | 2.55% | 0.21% | 2.34% |
| TJXTjx Cos., Inc. | 2.46% | 0.26% | 2.20% |
| SBUXStarbucks Corp | 2.01% | 0.18% | 1.83% |
| LOWLowes Cos., Inc. | 1.86% | 0.19% | 1.67% |
| DASHDoordash Inc | 1.39% | 0.11% | 1.28% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co. | 1.29% | 0.11% | 1.18% |
97.2% of GXPD is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPD or VOO?
GXPD has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GXPD or VOO?
Over the past year GXPD returned -1.81% vs +17.58% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPD annualized +2.05% vs +19.09% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GXPD or VOO?
GXPD has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 12.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: GXPD -16.6% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both GXPD and VOO?
GXPD and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPD and VOO?
97.2% of GXPD's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.2% of VOO's is in holdings GXPD also owns. They hold 39 positions in common, counted across the 46 positions we hold weights for in GXPD and 505 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPD or VOO?
GXPD yields 0.34% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than GXPD?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.90. VOO is less concentrated, with 36.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 78.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.