GXPD vs VTI
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GXPD | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $51M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 51 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +1.34% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.51% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -16.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 22, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
GXPD vs VTI Performance
Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Discretionary ETF (GXPD) is a ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GXPD returned +6.51% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, GXPD is up 1.34% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GXPD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.6% for GXPD and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.89. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GXPD charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GXPD currently yields 0.34% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
GXPD and VTI share 44 holdings out of 2792 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GXPD or VTI?
GXPD has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, GXPD or VTI?
Over the past year GXPD returned +6.51% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), GXPD annualized +5.37% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, GXPD or VTI?
GXPD has been the more volatile fund at 16.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: GXPD -16.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both GXPD and VTI?
GXPD and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.89, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between GXPD and VTI?
GXPD and VTI share 44 common holdings with a 8.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2792 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, GXPD or VTI?
GXPD yields 0.34% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.