HAP vs QQQ
HAP vs QQQ
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. HAP delivered stronger 1-year returns. HAP offers more diversification with 120 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $294M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.99% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 146 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +19.04% | +18.20% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.52% | +27.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | +25.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.17% | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 29, 2008 | Mar 10, 1999 |
HAP vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year HAP returned +40.52% while QQQ returned +27.63%. Year to date, HAP is up 19.04% versus a gain of 18.20% for QQQ.
Over three years, HAP compounded at +15.42% per year against +25.54% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +15.12% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.11% annualized vs +6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.1% for HAP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HAP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAP charges 0.41% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $18 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAP currently yields 1.99% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAP or QQQ?
HAP has an expense ratio of 0.41% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $23 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HAP or QQQ?
Over the past year HAP returned +40.52% vs +27.63% for QQQ, so HAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), HAP annualized +6.00% vs +13.11% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HAP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.1% for HAP. Worst drawdown: HAP -50.7% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both HAP and QQQ?
HAP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HAP and QQQ?
HAP and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 221 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAP or QQQ?
HAP yields 1.99% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so HAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.