HAP vs IVV

Quick Verdict

IVV has a lower expense ratio. HAP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: IVVHigher Returns: HAPMore Diversified: IVV

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHAPIVVWinner
Expense Ratio0.41%0.03%
AUM$294M$865.2B
Dividend Yield1.99%1.09%
Holdings146508
YTD Return+19.04%+13.80%
1Y Return+40.52%+23.70%
3Y Return (annualized)+15.42%+21.49%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.17%+13.43%
Volatility (annualized)20.1%15.1%
Max Drawdown-50.7%-56.5%
Fund FamilyVanEckiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionAug 29, 2008May 15, 2000

HAP vs IVV Performance

VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HAP returned +40.52% while IVV returned +23.70%. Year to date, HAP is up 19.04% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.

Over three years, HAP compounded at +15.42% per year against +21.49% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.17% and +13.43% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.05% annualized vs +6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

HAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HAP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HAP charges 0.41% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $3 annually, a gap of $38 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAP currently yields 1.99% against 1.09% for IVV.

Holdings Overlap

4.2%overlap

HAP and IVV share 30 holdings out of 595 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.2% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HAPWeight in IVVDifference
XOM5.05%0.97%4.08%
DE5.29%0.23%5.06%
CVX4.97%0.55%4.42%
NEEProProPro
CTVAProProPro
ADMProProPro
FCXProProPro
COPProProPro
CFProProPro
TSNProProPro
See all 10 holdings HAP shares with IVV
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
Get FundXLS Pro: $29/moFirst 500 subscribers, then $49/mo. Cancel anytime.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HAP or IVV?

HAP has an expense ratio of 0.41% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $38 per year of difference.

Which performed better, HAP or IVV?

Over the past year HAP returned +40.52% vs +23.70% for IVV, so HAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), HAP annualized +6.00% vs +7.05% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, HAP or IVV?

HAP has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HAP -50.7% vs IVV -56.5%.

Should I hold both HAP and IVV?

HAP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.

What is the holdings overlap between HAP and IVV?

HAP and IVV share 30 common holdings with a 4.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 595 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, HAP or IVV?

HAP yields 1.99% while IVV yields 1.09%, so HAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

See inside every ETF you own
$29/moCancel anytime.
Try FundXLS →