HAP vs VYM
VanEck Natural Resources ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, HAP or VYM?
Each has led over a different period.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HAP | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.41% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $299M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 2.24% |
| Holdings | 131 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +28.04%Best | +14.33% |
| 1Y Return | +44.28%Best | +20.01% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.44%Best | +18.43% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.77%Best | +12.16% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -50.7% | -49.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,061Best | $17,750 |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.8% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 29, 2008 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 3, 2008 to Sep 8, 2026 (18 years).
HAP vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18 years both funds cover.
HAP vs VYM Performance
VanEck Natural Resources ETF (HAP) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HAP returned +44.28% while VYM returned +20.01%. Year to date, HAP is up 28.04% versus a gain of 14.33% for VYM.
Over three years, HAP compounded at +18.44% per year against +18.43% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +13.77% and +12.16% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +8.41% annualized vs +6.40%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HAP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 14.7% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -50.7% for HAP and -49.3% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HAP charges 0.41% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $41 vs $4 annually, a gap of $37 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HAP currently yields 1.94% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
31.7% of HAP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.7% of VYM's money is in holdings HAP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
33 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in HAP and 602 in VYM, against full books of 131 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 537 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for HAP (87.6% of the fund), and 17 for HAP that do not appear in VYM (22.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HAP | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp | 4.83% | 2.36% | 2.47% |
| CVXChevron Corp.United States -Energy | 4.71% | 1.28% | 3.43% |
| NEENextera Energy Inc | 3.73% | 0.76% | 2.97% |
| NEMNewmont Corp. | 1.65% | 0.41% | 1.24% |
| ADMArcher-Daniels-Midland Co. | 1.62% | 0.15% | 1.47% |
| COPConocophillips Co | 1.04% | 0.53% | 0.51% |
| CFCf Industries Ho | 1.14% | 0.07% | 1.07% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 1.04% | 0.07% | 0.97% |
| WMBWilliams Cos Inc/the | 0.65% | 0.38% | 0.27% |
| NUENucor Corp. | 0.80% | 0.20% | 0.60% |
31.7% of HAP is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HAP or VYM?
HAP has an expense ratio of 0.41% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, HAP or VYM?
Over the past year HAP returned +44.28% vs +20.01% for VYM, so HAP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), HAP annualized +6.40% vs +8.41% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, HAP or VYM?
HAP has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 14.7% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HAP -50.7% vs VYM -49.3%.
Should I hold both HAP and VYM?
HAP and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between HAP and VYM?
31.7% of HAP's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 9.7% of VYM's is in holdings HAP also owns. They hold 33 positions in common, counted across the 133 positions we hold weights for in HAP and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, HAP or VYM?
HAP yields 1.94% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than HAP?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. HAP led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VYM over the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.