HF vs QQQY
DGA Core Plus Absolute Return ETF vs Defiance Nasdaq 100 Weekly Distribution ETF
Which is better, HF or QQQY?
Each has led over a different period.
QQQY has a lower expense ratio. HF led over 1Y, QQQY over the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HF | QQQY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.70% | 1.01%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $169M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.88% | 35.29% |
| Holdings | 57 | 9 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 7.1%Best | 9.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -3.9%Best | -10.1% |
| $10,000 over 1.2 years | $11,529 | $11,969Best |
| Fund Family | Days Global Advisors | Defiance ETFs, LLC |
| Category | Alternative | Alternative |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Multi Alternative |
| Inception | Aug 2, 2023 | Sep 13, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 699 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. HF has data through Dec 12, 2024 and QQQY through Nov 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 14, 2023 to Dec 12, 2024 (1.2 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 9.9% compared with 7.1% for HF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -3.9% for HF and -10.1% for QQQY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HF charges 1.70% per year while QQQY charges 1.01%. On a $10,000 position that is $170 vs $101 annually, a gap of $69 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HF currently yields 0.88% against 35.29% for QQQY.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 17 holdings in HF and 1 in QQQY, totalling 84.8% and 1.4% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 1 positions appear in both.
1 positions in common, counted across the 17 positions we hold weights for in HF and 1 in QQQY, against full books of 57 and 9.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in HF | Weight in QQQY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund | 0.23% | 1.42% | 1.19% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HF and QQQY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HF or QQQY?
HF has an expense ratio of 1.70% while QQQY charges 1.01%. QQQY is the cheaper option, by $69 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, HF or QQQY?
QQQY has been the more volatile fund at 9.9% annualized versus 7.1% for HF. Worst drawdown: HF -3.9% vs QQQY -10.1%.
Should I hold both HF and QQQY?
HF and QQQY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, HF or QQQY?
HF yields 0.88% while QQQY yields 35.29%, so QQQY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQY better than HF?
QQQY has a lower expense ratio. HF led over 1Y, QQQY over the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.