HTEC vs VYM
HTEC vs VYM
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. HTEC delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HTEC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $75M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +14.72% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +44.36% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +12.41% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.20% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Robo Global | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
HTEC vs VYM Performance
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is a ETF from Robo Global and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year HTEC returned +44.36% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, HTEC is up 14.72% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, HTEC compounded at +12.41% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -3.20% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HTEC has the edge at +7.68% annualized vs +7.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for HTEC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HTEC charges 0.68% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $4 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HTEC currently yields 0.92% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
HTEC and VYM share 3 holdings out of 614 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HTEC or VYM?
HTEC has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $64 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HTEC or VYM?
Over the past year HTEC returned +44.36% vs +26.12% for VYM, so HTEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HTEC annualized +7.68% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HTEC or VYM?
HTEC has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: HTEC -57.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both HTEC and VYM?
HTEC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HTEC and VYM?
HTEC and VYM share 3 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 614 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HTEC or VYM?
HTEC yields 0.92% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.