HTEC vs IVV
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. HTEC delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HTEC | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $75M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.92% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 60 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.70% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +45.22% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.48% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.47% | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -57.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Robo Global | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 25, 2019 | May 15, 2000 |
HTEC vs IVV Performance
ROBO Global Healthcare Technology and Innovation ETF (HTEC) is a ETF from Robo Global and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year HTEC returned +45.22% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, HTEC is up 16.70% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, HTEC compounded at +13.48% per year against +21.77% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -2.47% and +13.39% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, HTEC has the edge at +7.93% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
HTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -57.5% for HTEC and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HTEC charges 0.68% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HTEC currently yields 0.92% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
HTEC and IVV share 20 holdings out of 544 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HTEC or IVV?
HTEC has an expense ratio of 0.68% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $65 per year of difference.
Which performed better, HTEC or IVV?
Over the past year HTEC returned +45.22% vs +23.01% for IVV, so HTEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), HTEC annualized +7.93% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, HTEC or IVV?
HTEC has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: HTEC -57.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both HTEC and IVV?
HTEC and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between HTEC and IVV?
HTEC and IVV share 20 common holdings with a 2.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 544 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, HTEC or IVV?
HTEC yields 0.92% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.