HUMM vs RJCA
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF vs RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF
Which is better, HUMM or RJCA?
HUMM costs less.
HUMM has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HUMM | RJCA |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49%Best | 0.61% |
| AUM | $2M | $617M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 20 | 72 |
| YTD Return | -8.10% | +2.36%Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 57.0%Tie | 57.0%Tie |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Carillon Family of Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 16, 2026 | Mar 21, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HUMM vs RJCA growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HUMM vs RJCA Performance
800VDC AI Datacenter Ecosystem ETF (HUMM) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and RJ ClariVest Capital Appreciation ETF (RJCA) is an ETF from Carillon Family of Funds. Year to date, HUMM is down 8.10% versus a gain of 2.36% for RJCA.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HUMM charges 0.49% per year while RJCA charges 0.61%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $61 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HUMM currently yields 0.00% against 0.00% for RJCA.
Holdings Overlap
18.2% of HUMM's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 1.5% of RJCA's money is in holdings HUMM also owns.
HUMM and RJCA share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in HUMM and 71 in RJCA, against full books of 20 and 72.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 67 positions for RJCA that do not appear in our book for HUMM (97.5% of the fund), and 10 for HUMM that do not appear in RJCA (50.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HUMM and RJCA you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HUMM or RJCA?
HUMM has an expense ratio of 0.49% while RJCA charges 0.61%. HUMM is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HUMM and RJCA?
18.2% of HUMM's money is in holdings RJCA also owns. 1.5% of RJCA's is in holdings HUMM also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 20 positions we hold weights for in HUMM and 71 in RJCA.
Which pays a higher dividend, HUMM or RJCA?
HUMM yields 0.00% while RJCA yields 0.00%, so RJCA currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RJCA better than HUMM?
HUMM has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.