HWGV vs VOO

HWGV vs VOO

Which is better, HWGV or VOO?

Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. HWGV is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: HWGV

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHWGVVOO
Expense Ratio0.70%0.03%Best
AUM$501,019.16$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings62509
YTD Return-0.78%+11.01%Best
1Y Return-+15.60%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.82%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.60%
Top 10 Weight31.2%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyHotchkis & Wiley FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionAug 27, 2026Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HWGV vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HWGV vs VOO Performance

Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund ETF (HWGV) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HWGV is down 0.78% versus a gain of 11.01% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HWGV charges 0.70% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $3 annually, a gap of $67 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HWGV currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

HWGV already in VOO54.1%
VOO already in HWGV6.6%

54.1% of HWGV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.6% of VOO's money is in holdings HWGV also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

31 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 494 in VOO, against full books of 62 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 456 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for HWGV (92.5% of the fund), and 7 for HWGV that do not appear in VOO (9.5%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HWGVWeight in VOODifference
WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A6.31%0.05%6.26%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A0.86%3.24%2.38%
GEHCGe Healthcare Technologies Inc3.28%0.05%3.23%
AIGAmerican International Gr3.26%0.06%3.20%
ELVElevance Health Inc2.89%0.13%2.76%
CRMSalesforce Inc Crm Us Equity2.71%0.23%2.48%
CICigna Corp.2.53%0.11%2.42%
WFCWells Fargo & Co.2.17%0.41%1.76%
MDTMedtronic Plc Ordinary Shares2.26%0.17%2.09%
FFIVF5 Networks Inc.2.34%0.04%2.30%

54.1% of HWGV is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HWGVVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HWGV or VOO?

HWGV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $67 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HWGV and VOO?

54.1% of HWGV's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 6.6% of VOO's is in holdings HWGV also owns. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, HWGV or VOO?

HWGV yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than HWGV?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. HWGV is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.