HWGV vs SCHD
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, HWGV or SCHD?
SCHD costs less.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. HWGV is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | HWGV | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $501,019.16 | $112.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 3.00% |
| Holdings | 62 | 103 |
| YTD Return | -0.78% | +24.04%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +27.95% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.51% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.80% |
| Top 10 Weight | 31.2%Best | 41.8% |
| Fund Family | Hotchkis & Wiley Funds | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Aug 27, 2026 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
HWGV vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
HWGV vs SCHD Performance
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund ETF (HWGV) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Year to date, HWGV is down 0.78% versus a gain of 24.04% for SCHD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
HWGV charges 0.70% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $6 annually, a gap of $64 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HWGV currently yields 0.00% against 3.00% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
4.6% of HWGV's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 5.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings HWGV also owns.
SCHD and HWGV share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 62 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for HWGV (94.7% of the fund), and 35 for HWGV that do not appear in SCHD (59.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of HWGV and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, HWGV or SCHD?
HWGV has an expense ratio of 0.70% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $64 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between HWGV and SCHD?
5.2% of SCHD's money is in holdings HWGV also owns. 5.2% of SCHD's is in holdings HWGV also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in HWGV and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, HWGV or SCHD?
HWGV yields 0.00% while SCHD yields 3.00%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than HWGV?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. HWGV is less concentrated, with 31.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.