HWO vs VTI

HWO vs VTI

Which is better, HWO or VTI?

Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. HWO led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns (1Y): HWOLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricHWOVTI
Expense Ratio0.90%0.03%Best
AUM$540,251.11$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings553,543
YTD Return+7.73%+11.53%Best
1Y Return-+15.74%
3Y Return (annualized)-+20.67%
5Y Return (annualized)-+11.59%
Top 10 Weight44.9%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyHotchkis & Wiley FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap ValueLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 22, 2026May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

HWO vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

HWO vs VTI Performance

Hotchkis & Wiley Opportunities Fund ETF (HWO) is an ETF from Hotchkis & Wiley Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, HWO is up 7.73% versus a gain of 11.53% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

HWO charges 0.90% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $90 vs $3 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, HWO currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

HWO already in VTI71.2%
VTI already in HWO10.9%

71.2% of HWO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.9% of VTI's money is in holdings HWO also owns.

Most of HWO is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

37 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in HWO and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 55 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,116 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for HWO (86.5% of the fund), and 10 for HWO that do not appear in VTI (12.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in HWOWeight in VTIDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.51%4.79%0.72%
WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A9.01%0.04%8.97%
CDWCDW Corporation4.66%0.03%4.63%
SLMSlm Corp3.97%0.01%3.96%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A0.71%2.90%2.19%
DDominion Energy Inc.3.51%0.08%3.43%
PPGPpg Industries Inc.3.32%0.03%3.29%
APAApa Corp3.13%0.02%3.11%
CRCCalifornia Resources Corp Common Stock2.54%0.01%2.53%
STGWStagwell Inc Common Stock Usd 0.000012.46%0.00%2.46%

71.2% of HWO is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

HWOVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, HWO or VTI?

HWO has an expense ratio of 0.90% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between HWO and VTI?

71.2% of HWO's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 10.9% of VTI's is in holdings HWO also owns. They hold 37 positions in common, counted across the 55 positions we hold weights for in HWO and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, HWO or VTI?

HWO yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than HWO?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. HWO led over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.