IAPR vs VTI

IAPR vs VTI

Which is better, IAPR or VTI?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricIAPRVTI
Expense Ratio0.85%0.03%Best
AUM$201M$666.9B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.03%
Holdings123,543
YTD Return+9.93%+12.57%Best
1Y Return+13.42%+17.22%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+11.50%+20.87%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+5.52%+11.86%Best
Volatility (annualized)8.0%Best15.5%
Max Drawdown-17.7%Best-25.4%
$10,000 over 5 years$13,082$17,514Best
Fund FamilyInnovator ETFs TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 31, 2021May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 1, 2021 to Sep 11, 2026 (5.4 years).

IAPR vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.4 years both funds cover.

IAPR vs VTI Performance

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is an ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IAPR returned +13.42% while VTI returned +17.22%. Year to date, IAPR is up 9.93% versus a gain of 12.57% for VTI.

Over three years, IAPR compounded at +11.50% per year against +20.87% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +5.52% and +11.86% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 8.0% for IAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for IAPR and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

IAPR charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IAPR currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of IAPR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

IAPRVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, IAPR or VTI?

IAPR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, IAPR or VTI?

Over the past year IAPR returned +13.42% vs +17.22% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, IAPR or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 8.0% for IAPR. Worst drawdown: IAPR -17.7% vs VTI -25.4%.

Should I hold both IAPR and VTI?

IAPR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, IAPR or VTI?

IAPR yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than IAPR?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.