IAPR vs VYM
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IAPR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $203M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +9.91% | +14.66% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.98% | +22.16% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.82% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.75% | +12.18% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IAPR vs VYM Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IAPR returned +13.98% while VYM returned +22.16%. Year to date, IAPR is up 9.91% versus a gain of 14.66% for VYM.
Over three years, IAPR compounded at +11.82% per year against +18.72% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +5.75% and +12.18% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.01% annualized vs +5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.6% compared with 8.1% for IAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for IAPR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IAPR charges 0.85% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $4 annually, a gap of $81 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IAPR currently yields 0.00% against 2.24% for VYM.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IAPR or VYM?
IAPR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $81 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IAPR or VYM?
Over the past year IAPR returned +13.98% vs +22.16% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IAPR annualized +5.74% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IAPR or VYM?
VYM has been the more volatile fund at 14.6% annualized versus 8.1% for IAPR. Worst drawdown: IAPR -17.7% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IAPR and VYM?
IAPR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IAPR or VYM?
IAPR yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.