IAPR vs VOO
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IAPR | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $203M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 6 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +9.91% | +12.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +13.98% | +20.92% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.82% | +21.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.75% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.7% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Innovator ETFs Trust | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 31, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IAPR vs VOO Performance
Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - April (IAPR) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IAPR returned +13.98% while VOO returned +20.92%. Year to date, IAPR is up 9.91% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.
Over three years, IAPR compounded at +11.82% per year against +21.79% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.75% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.1% for IAPR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.7% for IAPR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IAPR charges 0.85% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IAPR currently yields 0.00% against 1.08% for VOO.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IAPR or VOO?
IAPR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IAPR or VOO?
Over the past year IAPR returned +13.98% vs +20.92% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), IAPR annualized +5.74% vs +13.45% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IAPR or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.1% for IAPR. Worst drawdown: IAPR -17.7% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IAPR and VOO?
IAPR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, IAPR or VOO?
IAPR yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.