IBID vs VTI
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBID | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.10% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $122M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.90% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 7 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +2.47% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +3.44% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +5.33% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 1.8% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -1.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 13, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
IBID vs VTI Performance
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBID returned +3.44% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IBID is up 2.47% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, IBID compounded at +5.33% per year against +21.93% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +5.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.4% compared with 1.8% for IBID. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -1.3% for IBID and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.15. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBID charges 0.10% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $10 vs $3 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBID currently yields 4.90% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IBID and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2793 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBID or VTI?
IBID has an expense ratio of 0.10% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBID or VTI?
Over the past year IBID returned +3.44% vs +22.43% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IBID annualized +5.33% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBID or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.4% annualized versus 1.8% for IBID. Worst drawdown: IBID -1.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IBID and VTI?
IBID and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.15, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBID and VTI?
IBID and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2793 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBID or VTI?
IBID yields 4.90% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IBID currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.