IBLC vs VYM
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBLC | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $82M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.34% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -1.11% | +16.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.24% | +24.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.07% | +18.60% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.5% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 25, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
IBLC vs VYM Performance
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% while VYM returned +24.43%. Year to date, IBLC is down 1.11% versus a gain of 16.78% for VYM.
Over three years, IBLC compounded at +33.07% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBLC has the edge at +18.12% annualized vs +7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.5% for IBLC and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBLC charges 0.47% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $4 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBLC currently yields 5.34% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBLC or VYM?
IBLC has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $43 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBLC or VYM?
Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% vs +24.43% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBLC annualized +18.12% vs +7.11% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBLC or VYM?
IBLC has been the more volatile fund at 67.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IBLC -62.5% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both IBLC and VYM?
IBLC and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBLC and VYM?
IBLC and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 1.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 598 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBLC or VYM?
IBLC yields 5.34% while VYM yields 2.86%, so IBLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.