IBLC vs VOO
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBLC | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $82M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.34% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -1.11% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.24% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.07% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.2% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.5% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 25, 2022 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IBLC vs VOO Performance
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, IBLC is down 1.11% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, IBLC compounded at +33.07% per year against +21.80% for VOO. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBLC has the edge at +18.12% annualized vs +13.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.2% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.5% for IBLC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBLC charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBLC currently yields 5.34% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IBLC and VOO share 8 holdings out of 539 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBLC or VOO?
IBLC has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBLC or VOO?
Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBLC annualized +18.12% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBLC or VOO?
IBLC has been the more volatile fund at 67.2% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IBLC -62.5% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IBLC and VOO?
IBLC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBLC and VOO?
IBLC and VOO share 8 common holdings with a 6.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 539 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBLC or VOO?
IBLC yields 5.34% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IBLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.