IBLC vs VXUS
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBLC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $82M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.34% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 52 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -1.11% | +15.00% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.24% | +26.87% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.07% | +19.79% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 67.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 25, 2022 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IBLC vs VXUS Performance
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% while VXUS returned +26.87%. Year to date, IBLC is down 1.11% versus a gain of 15.00% for VXUS.
Over three years, IBLC compounded at +33.07% per year against +19.79% for VXUS. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBLC has the edge at +18.12% annualized vs +4.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBLC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 67.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.5% for IBLC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBLC charges 0.47% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $5 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBLC currently yields 5.34% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IBLC and VXUS share 4 holdings out of 7899 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBLC or VXUS?
IBLC has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBLC or VXUS?
Over the past year IBLC returned +11.24% vs +26.87% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBLC annualized +18.12% vs +4.88% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBLC or VXUS?
IBLC has been the more volatile fund at 67.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IBLC -62.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IBLC and VXUS?
IBLC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBLC and VXUS?
IBLC and VXUS share 4 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7899 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBLC or VXUS?
IBLC yields 5.34% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so IBLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.