IBMR vs VTI
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IBMR or VTI?
Intermediate Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBMR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $480M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.53% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 1,805 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -1.87% | +12.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | -1.87% | +16.08%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.82% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3%Best | 13.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $9,966 | $19,313Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Intermediate Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 9, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.4 years).
IBMR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
IBMR vs VTI Performance
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMR) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBMR returned -1.87% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, IBMR is down 1.87% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, IBMR compounded at +2.82% per year against +21.01% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.2% compared with 4.3% for IBMR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for IBMR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.64. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBMR charges 0.18% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBMR currently yields 2.53% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 322 holdings in IBMR and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 23.9% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 322 positions we hold weights for in IBMR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 1,805 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IBMR and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBMR or VTI?
IBMR has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBMR or VTI?
Over the past year IBMR returned -1.87% vs +16.08% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBMR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.2% annualized versus 4.3% for IBMR. Worst drawdown: IBMR -10.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both IBMR and VTI?
IBMR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.64, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBMR or VTI?
IBMR yields 2.53% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IBMR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IBMR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.