IBOT vs VXUS
VanEck Robotics ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. IBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBOT | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $93M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +26.33% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +46.26% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.12% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2023 | Jan 26, 2011 |
IBOT vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBOT returned +46.26% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, IBOT is up 26.33% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, IBOT compounded at +25.12% per year against +19.27% for VXUS. Across the full 3-year window we track, IBOT has the edge at +25.75% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for IBOT and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBOT charges 0.47% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $5 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBOT currently yields 0.29% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
IBOT and VXUS share 32 holdings out of 7894 unique holdings combined, representing a 2.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBOT or VXUS?
IBOT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $42 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBOT or VXUS?
Over the past year IBOT returned +46.26% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so IBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IBOT annualized +25.75% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBOT or VXUS?
IBOT has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: IBOT -23.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both IBOT and VXUS?
IBOT and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBOT and VXUS?
IBOT and VXUS share 32 common holdings with a 2.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7894 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBOT or VXUS?
IBOT yields 0.29% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.