IBOT vs QQQ
VanEck Robotics ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. IBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBOT | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $91M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 69 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +22.59% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +40.41% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.11% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IBOT vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IBOT returned +40.41% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, IBOT is up 22.59% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, IBOT compounded at +25.11% per year against +25.75% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, IBOT has the edge at +24.33% annualized vs +13.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 20.5% for IBOT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for IBOT and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBOT charges 0.47% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $18 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBOT currently yields 0.33% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IBOT and QQQ share 11 holdings out of 156 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBOT or QQQ?
IBOT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $29 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBOT or QQQ?
Over the past year IBOT returned +40.41% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so IBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IBOT annualized +24.33% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBOT or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 20.5% for IBOT. Worst drawdown: IBOT -23.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IBOT and QQQ?
IBOT and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBOT and QQQ?
IBOT and QQQ share 11 common holdings with a 13.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 156 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBOT or QQQ?
IBOT yields 0.33% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.