IBOT vs VOO
VanEck Robotics ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. IBOT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBOT | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $93M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.29% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 71 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +28.25% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +45.27% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.20% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IBOT vs VOO Performance
VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBOT returned +45.27% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, IBOT is up 28.25% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, IBOT compounded at +26.20% per year against +21.55% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, IBOT has the edge at +26.20% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for IBOT and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBOT charges 0.47% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBOT currently yields 0.29% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IBOT and VOO share 15 holdings out of 555 unique holdings combined, representing a 8.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBOT or VOO?
IBOT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IBOT or VOO?
Over the past year IBOT returned +45.27% vs +21.63% for VOO, so IBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), IBOT annualized +26.20% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IBOT or VOO?
IBOT has been the more volatile fund at 20.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IBOT -23.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IBOT and VOO?
IBOT and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IBOT and VOO?
IBOT and VOO share 15 common holdings with a 8.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 555 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBOT or VOO?
IBOT yields 0.29% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.