IBOT vs VTI
VanEck Robotics ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IBOT or VTI?
IBOT has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBOT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IBOT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.47% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $91M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.30% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 66 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +17.47%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +26.77%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.75%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.5% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -23.3% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.5 years | $20,166Best | $19,465 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 5, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 6, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.5 years).
IBOT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.5 years both funds cover.
IBOT vs VTI Performance
VanEck Robotics ETF (IBOT) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IBOT returned +26.77% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, IBOT is up 17.47% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, IBOT compounded at +23.75% per year against +21.01% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, IBOT has the edge at +22.19% annualized vs +20.96%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IBOT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.5% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -23.3% for IBOT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IBOT charges 0.47% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $47 vs $3 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IBOT currently yields 0.30% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
44.2% of IBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.2% of VTI's money is in holdings IBOT also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in IBOT and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 66 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,127 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IBOT (88.3% of the fund), and 0 for IBOT that do not appear in VTI (0.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IBOT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.41% | 6.40% | 0.99% |
| EMREmerson Electric Co. | 5.37% | 0.12% | 5.25% |
| ADSKAutodesk, Inc. | 4.30% | 0.07% | 4.23% |
| ROKRockwell Automation | 3.49% | 0.07% | 3.42% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 2.65% | 0.04% | 2.61% |
| TDYTeledyne Technologies Inc | 2.32% | 0.04% | 2.28% |
| LECOLincoln Electric Holdings Inc | 2.07% | 0.02% | 2.05% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.38% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.40% | 0.51% | 0.89% |
| OIIOceaneering Intl Inc. | 1.84% | 0.01% | 1.83% |
44.2% of IBOT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IBOT or VTI?
IBOT has an expense ratio of 0.47% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IBOT or VTI?
Over the past year IBOT returned +26.77% vs +16.08% for VTI, so IBOT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), IBOT annualized +22.19% vs +20.96% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IBOT or VTI?
IBOT has been the more volatile fund at 20.5% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IBOT -23.3% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both IBOT and VTI?
IBOT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IBOT and VTI?
44.2% of IBOT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.2% of VTI's is in holdings IBOT also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 65 positions we hold weights for in IBOT and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IBOT or VTI?
IBOT yields 0.30% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IBOT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IBOT led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.