IDMO vs IVV
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IDMO or IVV?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDMO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IDMO is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDMO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $4.3B | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 203 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +14.35%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +24.21%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.49%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.49%Best | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.2% | 14.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,672Best | $18,327 |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2012 to Sep 4, 2026 (14.5 years).
IDMO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.5 years both funds cover.
IDMO vs IVV Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDMO returned +24.21% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, IDMO is up 14.35% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, IDMO compounded at +26.49% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +14.49% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +13.23% annualized vs +7.66%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.2% compared with 14.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for IDMO and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDMO charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDMO currently yields 3.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of IDMO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings IDMO also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 191 positions we hold weights for in IDMO and 505 in IVV, against full books of 203 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IDMO (99.2% of the fund), and 3 for IDMO that do not appear in IVV (5.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDMO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| HONHoneywell International Inc. | 0.29% | 0.12% | 0.17% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IDMO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IDMO or IVV?
Over the past year IDMO returned +24.21% vs +20.08% for IVV, so IDMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IDMO annualized +7.66% vs +13.23% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.2% annualized versus 14.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IDMO -40.6% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both IDMO and IVV?
IDMO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO yields 3.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IDMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IDMO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDMO led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IDMO is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.