IDMO vs IVV
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDMO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.3B | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 203 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +13.99% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.75% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.22% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.06% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2012 | May 15, 2000 |
IDMO vs IVV Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDMO returned +23.75% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, IDMO is up 13.99% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, IDMO compounded at +27.22% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +16.06% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, IDMO has the edge at +7.67% annualized vs +7.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for IDMO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDMO charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDMO currently yields 3.30% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
IDMO and IVV share 0 holdings out of 694 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDMO or IVV?
Over the past year IDMO returned +23.75% vs +21.79% for IVV, so IDMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IDMO annualized +7.67% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: IDMO -40.6% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both IDMO and IVV?
IDMO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDMO and IVV?
IDMO and IVV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 694 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDMO or IVV?
IDMO yields 3.30% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IDMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.