IDMO vs VTI
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. IDMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDMO | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.3B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 203 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +13.99% | +14.82% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.75% | +22.43% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.22% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +16.06% | +12.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2012 | May 24, 2001 |
IDMO vs VTI Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDMO returned +23.75% while VTI returned +22.43%. Year to date, IDMO is up 13.99% versus a gain of 14.82% for VTI.
Over three years, IDMO compounded at +27.22% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +16.06% and +12.34% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +7.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.3% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for IDMO and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDMO charges 0.25% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDMO currently yields 3.30% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IDMO and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2976 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDMO or VTI?
IDMO has an expense ratio of 0.25% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $22 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDMO or VTI?
Over the past year IDMO returned +23.75% vs +22.43% for VTI, so IDMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IDMO annualized +7.67% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDMO or VTI?
IDMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.3% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IDMO -40.6% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IDMO and VTI?
IDMO and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDMO and VTI?
IDMO and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2976 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDMO or VTI?
IDMO yields 3.30% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IDMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.