IDMO vs QQQ
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. IDMO offers more diversification with 203 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDMO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $4.3B | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.30% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 203 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +12.01% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.62% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.74% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.75% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -40.6% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2012 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IDMO vs QQQ Performance
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IDMO returned +21.62% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, IDMO is up 12.01% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, IDMO compounded at +26.74% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +15.75% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +7.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.3% for IDMO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -40.6% for IDMO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDMO charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDMO currently yields 3.30% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IDMO and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 291 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDMO or QQQ?
IDMO has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $7 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDMO or QQQ?
Over the past year IDMO returned +21.62% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), IDMO annualized +7.53% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDMO or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.3% for IDMO. Worst drawdown: IDMO -40.6% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IDMO and QQQ?
IDMO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDMO and QQQ?
IDMO and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 291 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDMO or QQQ?
IDMO yields 3.30% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IDMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.