IDVZ vs IVV
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, IDVZ or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDVZ led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. IDVZ is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDVZ | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $199M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 44 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +6.76% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.80% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.27% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.95% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 12.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $14,051Best | $13,074 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
IDVZ vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
IDVZ vs IVV Performance
Polen International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year IDVZ returned +12.80% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, IDVZ is up 6.76% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.6% compared with 10.2% for IDVZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for IDVZ and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.20. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDVZ charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDVZ currently yields 3.36% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 44 holdings in IDVZ and 505 in IVV, totalling 99.7% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in IDVZ and 505 in IVV, against full books of 44 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 495 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for IDVZ (99.3% of the fund), and 18 for IDVZ that do not appear in IVV (44.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IDVZ and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDVZ or IVV?
IDVZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IDVZ or IVV?
Over the past year IDVZ returned +12.80% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IDVZ annualized +22.15% vs +17.08% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IDVZ or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.6% annualized versus 10.2% for IDVZ. Worst drawdown: IDVZ -11.0% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both IDVZ and IVV?
IDVZ and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.20, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDVZ or IVV?
IDVZ yields 3.36% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IDVZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than IDVZ?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IDVZ led over the full window, IVV over 1Y. IDVZ is less concentrated, with 32.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.