IDVZ vs QQQ
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDVZ | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $196M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 44 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +8.89% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.84% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.1% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IDVZ vs QQQ Performance
Polen International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is a ETF from TrueShares and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IDVZ returned +17.84% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IDVZ is up 8.89% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 10.1% for IDVZ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for IDVZ and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.05. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDVZ charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDVZ currently yields 3.36% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IDVZ and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 145 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDVZ | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASL:AS | 2.39% | 0.68% | 1.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDVZ or QQQ?
IDVZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IDVZ or QQQ?
Over the past year IDVZ returned +17.84% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IDVZ annualized +24.48% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IDVZ or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 10.1% for IDVZ. Worst drawdown: IDVZ -11.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IDVZ and QQQ?
IDVZ and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.05, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IDVZ and QQQ?
IDVZ and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 145 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDVZ or QQQ?
IDVZ yields 3.36% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IDVZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.