IDVZ vs VYM
Polen International Dividend Income ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, IDVZ or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IDVZ led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IDVZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $199M | $81.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.36% | 2.22% |
| Holdings | 44 | 613 |
| YTD Return | +6.76% | +13.91%Best |
| 1Y Return | +12.80% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.12% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.17% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2% | 9.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.0%Best | -14.5% |
| $10,000 over 1.7 years | $14,051Best | $13,141 |
| Top 10 Weight | 32.5% | 25.9%Best |
| Fund Family | TrueShares | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Dec 26, 2024 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 27, 2024 to Sep 11, 2026 (1.7 years).
IDVZ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.7 years both funds cover.
IDVZ vs VYM Performance
Polen International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is an ETF from TrueShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IDVZ returned +12.80% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, IDVZ is up 6.76% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IDVZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 10.2% compared with 9.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.0% for IDVZ and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IDVZ charges 0.75% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $4 annually, a gap of $71 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IDVZ currently yields 3.36% against 2.22% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
2.4% of IDVZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns.
IDVZ and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in IDVZ and 603 in VYM, against full books of 44 and 613.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 567 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for IDVZ (97.5% of the fund), and 17 for IDVZ that do not appear in VYM (42.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IDVZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| UVVUNIVERSAL-ADR | 2.35% | 0.01% | 2.34% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IDVZ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IDVZ or VYM?
IDVZ has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $71 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IDVZ or VYM?
Over the past year IDVZ returned +12.80% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), IDVZ annualized +22.15% vs +17.43% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IDVZ or VYM?
IDVZ has been the more volatile fund at 10.2% annualized versus 9.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: IDVZ -11.0% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both IDVZ and VYM?
IDVZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IDVZ and VYM?
2.4% of IDVZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 0.0% of VYM's is in holdings IDVZ also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 44 positions we hold weights for in IDVZ and 603 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, IDVZ or VYM?
IDVZ yields 3.36% while VYM yields 2.22%, so IDVZ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than IDVZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. IDVZ led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.