IMVP vs QQQ
Invesco India ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMVP | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $108M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.18% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 34 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -16.14% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | -15.12% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.65% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.72% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.1% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2008 | Mar 10, 1999 |
IMVP vs QQQ Performance
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year IMVP returned -15.12% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, IMVP is down 16.14% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, IMVP compounded at +1.65% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +1.72% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +1.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.6% for IMVP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.1% for IMVP and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.55. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMVP charges 0.78% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $18 annually, a gap of $60 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMVP currently yields 11.18% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
IMVP and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 132 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMVP or QQQ?
IMVP has an expense ratio of 0.78% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $60 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMVP or QQQ?
Over the past year IMVP returned -15.12% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IMVP annualized +1.21% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMVP or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.6% for IMVP. Worst drawdown: IMVP -77.1% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both IMVP and QQQ?
IMVP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.55, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMVP and QQQ?
IMVP and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 132 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMVP or QQQ?
IMVP yields 11.18% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so IMVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.