IMVP vs VOO
Invesco India ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMVP | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $123M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.28% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -14.47% | +14.48% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.96% | +22.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.40% | +21.80% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.21% | +13.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2008 | Sep 7, 2010 |
IMVP vs VOO Performance
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMVP returned -11.96% while VOO returned +22.02%. Year to date, IMVP is down 14.47% versus a gain of 14.48% for VOO.
Over three years, IMVP compounded at +2.40% per year against +21.80% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +2.21% and +13.36% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs +1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.1% for IMVP and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.52. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMVP charges 0.78% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMVP currently yields 11.28% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
IMVP and VOO share 0 holdings out of 534 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMVP or VOO?
IMVP has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMVP or VOO?
Over the past year IMVP returned -11.96% vs +22.02% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), IMVP annualized +1.32% vs +13.61% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMVP or VOO?
IMVP has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: IMVP -77.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both IMVP and VOO?
IMVP and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.52, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMVP and VOO?
IMVP and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 534 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMVP or VOO?
IMVP yields 11.28% while VOO yields 1.09%, so IMVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.