IMVP vs VTI
Invesco India ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, IMVP or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMVP | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $96M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 11.23% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 67 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -22.46% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -19.24% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -1.17% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.92% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 16.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -77.1% | -52.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,548 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 36.9% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 7, 2008 to Oct 2, 2026 (18.6 years).
IMVP vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.6 years both funds cover.
IMVP vs VTI Performance
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMVP returned -19.24% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, IMVP is down 22.46% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, IMVP compounded at -1.17% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -0.92% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 19-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +10.48% annualized vs +0.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 16.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.1% for IMVP and -52.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMVP charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMVP currently yields 11.23% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
3.4% of IMVP's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
IMVP and VTI share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, IMVP as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in IMVP and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 67 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,150 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for IMVP (97.5% of the fund), and 1 for IMVP that do not appear in VTI (3.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in IMVP | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHEBenchmark Electronics Inc | 3.43% | 0.00% | 3.43% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IMVP and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IMVP or VTI?
Over the past year IMVP returned -19.24% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (19 years), IMVP annualized +0.78% vs +10.48% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 16.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IMVP -77.1% vs VTI -52.6%.
Should I hold both IMVP and VTI?
IMVP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between IMVP and VTI?
3.4% of IMVP's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.0% of VTI's is in holdings IMVP also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in IMVP and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP yields 11.23% while VTI yields 1.03%, so IMVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than IMVP?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.