IMVP vs VTI
Invesco India ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IMVP | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $123M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 11.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 38 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -14.47% | +14.96% | |
| 1Y Return | -11.96% | +22.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +2.40% | +21.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +2.21% | +12.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.6% | 15.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 5, 2008 | May 24, 2001 |
IMVP vs VTI Performance
Invesco India ETF (IMVP) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IMVP returned -11.96% while VTI returned +22.39%. Year to date, IMVP is down 14.47% versus a gain of 14.96% for VTI.
Over three years, IMVP compounded at +2.40% per year against +21.51% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +2.21% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.16% annualized vs +1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IMVP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.6% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.1% for IMVP and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.61. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IMVP charges 0.78% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $3 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IMVP currently yields 11.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
IMVP and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2812 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $75 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IMVP or VTI?
Over the past year IMVP returned -11.96% vs +22.39% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), IMVP annualized +1.32% vs +8.16% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP has been the more volatile fund at 24.6% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: IMVP -77.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both IMVP and VTI?
IMVP and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.61, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between IMVP and VTI?
IMVP and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2812 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IMVP or VTI?
IMVP yields 11.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so IMVP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.